The Evolution of our Digital Senses

Digital Marketing > The evolution of our digital sensesCaveat Emptor: Superficially, this post has nothing to with Inbound Marketing Automation per se, and everything to do with how humans will continue to use digital means of communication – now and ever more so in the future.

Isaac Azimov’s novel, The Naked Sun, introduced us to a planet called Solaria, where people no longer interact with each other in person. Instead, holographic avatars of themselves interact with the avatars of other people in public. They were there, virtually, but without smell, taste or touch.

You’re probably wondering about sex in a society like this. In Azimov’s world, it was mostly a solitary affair with test-tube babies born in the planetary birthing center and reared by machines.

And about now you’re probably also wondering just where this post is headed.

Seems to me we’re on the road to Solaria and there’s no looking back. We do business today with people we never meet in person: never evaluate their handshake, never see their tense or relaxed body, never hear the sincerity or falseness in their voice, or smell the excitement or fear on their skin. Our senses have evolved over millions of years to enable us to make rapid and usually accurate assessments of people and situations. And now social media’s digital connections between people have rendered useless at least 3 and often 4 of our senses. How are we going to adapt quickly enough to deal with the change which is already upon us?

Many of us today communicate via the written word. We’ve reduced our means of getting to know people to the words they type. And lets face it; some of us are better at using words than others. Minus the other senses, it’s difficult to build trust and without trust there is no real relationship.

So just how can we evaluate a person’s digital trust factor?

One way we do so today is to use Google’s judgment. We implicitly trust sites which rank higher on Google’s result lists, or perhaps it’s simply that we mistrust the sites which don’t make it to page one. But either way, we click a link, striving to form a relationship to someone trusted, who can and will answer our questions.

Safety in numbers, this need for relationships, is built into our genes – our effort to increase the number of our connections on LinkedIn and followers on Twitter is proof of that. Although we understand that these links to others are not tangible in the beginning, we intrinsically believe that actions speak louder than words. Over time – when the person on the other end of the digital link has proved reliable, a relationship can be established. This is the essence of ebay’s and Amazon’s trust ratings.

What do you see ahead? There are two possible alternatives – additional technology to enhance our interactions, and adaptive changes to our own ways of perceiving people.

I’m guessing it will be a combination of the two, because new advancements in sensory transmission and reception will dictate changes in the ways in which we interact with each other.

Sounds like a product to me: sniffers to sample a person’s pheromones or smell, convert them to digital bits, and then at the other end, spray them out at the recipient’s nose. And the person who perfects this and touch telemetry is going to make a lot of money, even if its sole purpose is to usher in a brave new world of safe sex.

What do you think?

  • No related resources.
  • Tags: ,

    November 24th, 09
    Eric
    Filed Under Blog Posts

    12 Responses to “The Evolution of our Digital Senses”

    1. My vote is that most change will be on the adaptive side. It’s easy, costs nothing, and humans excel at adaptation.

      Consider that 100 years ago communication was essentially two-dimensional. People accepted or rejected proposals of marriage or business by letter, and countries went to war over written words. Words were written carefully, and carried weight.

      Since then we’ve grown accustomed to rich media and full sensory interaction. Personally, I dislike writing letters, and would rather call, skype, or hop on a plane.

      Could we cope once again in a more sensory-constrained world? Just watch my teenagers, who prefer to spend hours on Facebook instead of walking down the street and having a face-to-face interaction with their friends. And, interestingly enough, they’ve developed a whole new language to express complex emotions using the typed word.

      Did we just go full circle?

    2. Thanks for the comment Axel. I like the concept you have brought in here – the evolution of the written word – from formal to Facebook. How long can it be before someone proposes via Facebook (maybe it’s already happened)?

    3. I think that the ability to look into the future, when it comes to human progress and interaction using technology, is something that is impossible for those of us that are beyond the age of 40 to predict.

      While I picked that number out of my hat more than anywhere else, I use it based on the fact that the home computer did not exist until 30 years ago and the internet, as we know it, did not come about until less than 20 years ago. As a result, the further beyond that benchmark number, the more astonishing and bizarre the digital world is to us.

      Because we were raised in the pre-digital times, we carry a lot of preconceived notions that those under 40 do not have to carry. If you do not agree with this, read your own emails and compare them with ones sent by others of a different age. Those over 40 use words in abundance, those under 40 are more frugal and those at the youngest end of the scale barely use them at all. As time goes on, however, and the youngest members of this example grow older, their use of words in communications increases. Either this is a result of the pre-digital old farts having an effect on the post-digital generation, or a realization by that younger generation that full communication between peers does have its benefits.

      Once the pre-digital generations are long gone and have no influence over the existing group of generations, it may well be that humanity will embrace interaction as a non-contact sport. It may also be, though, that those influences may never fully disappear, or if they do, it is also possible that humanity, at that time, may yearn for its return.

      While trying to predict the future is an enjoyable academic exercise, doing so at my age is, I believe, an impossible task, and something I will leave to the younger crowd.

    4. Mitch;
      Thanks for your comment! What an interesting slant on the idea and you have a point about brevity versus age – just look at the “words” used in text messages these days. R U w me?
      But having said that, however, and definitely being over 40 myself, I will stick to my guns and say that non-human forms of connection are going to be with us for a long time to come, even if they change in time to be “mental transmissions” or some other form of wave energy. And if they do, you’re right – they may not be “digital” per se, but they won’t involve using our senses in the ways that we have done to date.

    5. Though off-topic, i am really enjoying the whole article alongwith the comments…wow, what amazing wordplay and thought processes abound here…

      Thanks to Mitch and Alex, even i have started looking from a similar perspective…here i am commenting on an article, without even feeling the sense of excitement being transferred to you, and neither can i sense what thoughts you are having upon reading this rant from me…

      me gonna come back for more such insightful reading…

    6. Paresh;
      Thanks for commenting – so glad you enjoyed! And just to close the loop, my emotions and thoughts on what you typed were:
      1) Joy at another commenter taking the time to share his thoughts
      2) Pleasure at the idea that the post served some function for you or at least gave you something to think about, and
      3) Delighted that you might become a regular reader.
      If you have some time, you may enjoy some of our other posts: although the others tend to focus around our topic like a good blog should, there are a few which incorporate some outside subject thinking. For examples:
      http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/blog/2009/07/28/sales-and-marketing-automation-made-easy/
      http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/blog/2009/08/22/q-whats-in-a-name-a-serp-ranking%E2%80%A6/
      http://www.inbound-marketing-automation.ca/blog/2009/09/27/the-inbound-marketing-dashboard/

    7. Great thread. Much of the work I do, write, and speak of is the unfolding nature of structured trust, collaboration across boundaries, and, most importantly, the expanding role of emotional bandwidth F2F and across the broadband width.

      The full circle of virtual handshake deals across continents happened before we could digitally monitor or agreement, and more friendships are maintained across time and distance.

      We already are changed. Some just more happily than others, maybe. tlh

    8. Trina;
      Thanks for the comment. I like the phrase of “unfolding nature of structured trust” – it sums up well what we all hope to achieve in our social media and b2b relationship building.
      Indeed you are right – we have already changed.

    9. It may be reassuring to know that 1.3 billion people still live like they did 6,000 years ago … or, as Kofe Anon pointed out at the millennium, “Half of the world’s population have never received or placed a phone call.”

      Digital concept bound “H. faber” vs. analog meaningful memory creating “H. ludens” have very different psychological paths — the tortoise and the hare … time to revisit Aesop.

      Thank you for your post.

    10. Hello Vlad;
      Nice insight – thanks! I don’t know the authors/artists you mention but will look them up.

    11. Great post and thread. It will be very interesting to see where the whole thing goes – up for a ride? In watchin my neice and her friends communicate, it reminds me of growing up wtih EGAD – only one phone line in the house, and that wasn’t that long ago.

    12. Jeff;
      Thanks for visiting and commenting and glad you found it of interest. I, too, enjoyed your post on Social Media is 30,000 years old – nice to see that the more things change, the more they stay the same, not so?

    Add your comment

    Your email is never published or shared

    Top B2B Blog List

    B2B Marketing


    This website is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Canada License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ca/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.

    Gossamar is proudly powered by WordPress
    Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS). 79 queries. 0.255 seconds.